The wellbeing economics debate continues…

Economics of Happiness

A new film The Economics of Happiness by Helena Norberg-Hodge, Steven Gorelick & John Page puts a new spin on the wellbeing economics debate by looking through the lens of localism.  The film features  experts from six continents including New Economics Foundation fellow Andrew Simms, and  Zac Goldsmith, conservative MP from Richmond Park and North Kingston.

In her article on CSRWire, Francesca Rehannon writes about the films position that “our spiritual satisfaction, our sense of security, our joy, derive from our deep connections with others and our natural environment. It also states globalization destroys security by undermining community, subordinating local connections to the dictates of distant profits and creating dissatisfaction by replacing local cultures with consumer culture.”

Interest in the subject has grown since Nobel economists Josef Stiglitz and Amartya Sen published a report commissioned by French President Nicolas Sarkozy which asserts that GDP as a measure of growth (and therefore success and therefore happiness?) is incomplete.  In November of last year, the UK government announced  a plan to measure happiness in an attempt to guide government policy, and have asked the Office of National Statistics to develop questions to effectively assess the nation’s well-being. The New Economics Foundation, which has done extensive work on National Accounts of Wellbeing, is on the advisory forum for the ONS programme, and also serves as the secretariat for the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Wellbeing Economics.

Join the debate on  Thursday 27 Jan at 6:30pm, by clicking here to sign-up for a free event at the LSE sponsored by the Office of National Statistics to discuss “whether a measure of happiness is enough to capture the well-being of our nation and what other measures should be taken into account.”

Click here for information on the London launch event for The Economics of Happiness on February 8, or here for a screening on Sunday Sep 13.

Does anyone know if  they’re talking about wellbeing economics in Davos?



Jan Gehl is sweet on people

Jan Gehl's Cities for People

On the heels of a sold out gig in New York’s West Village, Jan Gehl spoke to an overflow crowd of 500 people at London’s NLA last Tuesday about his latest book “Cities for People.”

After a brief introduction by none other than Lord Richard Rogers (who wrote the books’ preface), Gehl gave a highly engaging talk summing up the vast body of knowledge he’s gained throughout his 50-some year career as an architect, academic, urban planner and most recently – global cult phenomenon.

Gehl’s basic principle is pretty simple –common sense really: design places so people can thrive. It’s just that for some reason around 1960 we lost our collective head and have been designing places that are totally out of whack with what makes us happy and keeps us healthy. As Gehl astutely pointed out, we actually know more about the ideal habitat for the silver mountain gorilla than we do about what kind of place keeps a homo sapien happy. Or at least if we know how to keep ourselves happy then we’re on some sort of self-destructive mission to make ourselves miserable and fat – and to sort of totally mess up our environment to boot. Good times!

Gehl conjured up images of master planners and architects as Godzilla-like figures hovering over models of a new city and making it beautiful from their perspective, but not giving a stuff about the micro-sized people running around below. He calls it Brasilia syndrome, which is basically shorthand for design from 5000 feet – or what it would look like as you fly over a place in an airplane or a helicopter. Another favorite Gehl-ism is “birdshit planning” whereby a giant bird flies over a city and randomly drops huge towers creating a beautiful skyline of unique and artistic masterpieces – not unlike the perfume bottles his wife keeps on the bathroom counter. The problem, Gehl says, with these amazing beautiful towers like those found in Dubai, is they’re just a collection of objects – not a city full of happy, thriving people. There’s no soul – there’s no THERE there.

But there are places that have been designed with people in mind. Looking at an arial photo of a housing development in Copenhagen locally known as the “Potato Rows” which were built in the late 1800s, a “form-obsessed architectural neophyte” (to quote an esteemed colleague) might not be overwhelmingly impressed. From an airplane these charming classic row houses look a bit boring and uninspired, and would likely get most architecture students kicked straight out of school. However, when you get to eye level an entirely different perspective emerges. Gehl pointed out the vibrant street life, sense of community and the walkability of the neighborhood. And the punchline? This boring little development boasts the highest real estate values in all of Copenhagen, and a boatload of urban planners, architects and even the mayor are proud to call the enclave home.

So what can we learn from the Potato Rows about how we should we design our villages, towns and major metropolitan areas so people WILL thrive? According to Gehl it’s all about scale – human scale to be exact. In traditional cities – those places we instinctively love because they’re lovely and beautiful and make us want to sit and eat an ice cream or sip a coffee – the Godzilla factor doesn’t win. Great traditional places like the Piazza del Campo in Siena, Italy, or cities like Barcelona, or Gehl’s own beloved Copenhagen which have grown on a foundation of progressive urbanism, and great new places like Curritiba in southern Brazil built on sustainability principles, all are full of small signals and eye-level details that can only be seen as you walk along a human-scale street at 5 km/hr. And Gehl Architecture’s extensive research in the public realm – which could be characterized as an anthropological study of the wild homo sapien in his natural urban environment – backs this up. We don’t just happen to love Venice because it has great food or because it’s romantic and old. We love places like this because they’re built in a way that works for an average human being just walking or biking around being human.

These cities “invite” people to walk or cycle, something that Gehl has been successful at doing in cities around the world, beginning with his ongoing work in Copenhagen where a full 37% of the population now commute to work by bike, thanks to the way the asphalt is allocated. Gehl’s gentle turn of phrase in “inviting” people to change their behavior actually puts a beautifully subtle spin on what is generally viewed as an impossible shift. But he makes a strong point – instead of building more roads to accommodate more cars, let’s stop for a moment and think about the purpose of the street. It’s pretty straightforward stuff really – design the roads for people instead of cars and you’ll have more walking and cycling. Allocate more asphalt to cars and you’ll have more automobile traffic.

His latest efforts in New York as part of PlaNYC have transformed New York’s famous Broadway into “Broadway Boulevard.” In just two short years, Gehl along with NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Traffic Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan have shut down bits of Times Square and Herald Square to automobile traffic and turned them into bustling pedestrian malls where millions of people per year stop and have lunch, enjoy a conversation or simply just watch “the ballet of the street,” a phrase Gehl borrows from Jane Jacobs “Death and Life of Great American Cities”. But it’s not all artistic and nicey-nicey people having a good time and frollicking. Back when Sadik-Khan hired Gehl for the project they might have predicted some impressive safety results like a 63% reduction in motorist and passenger injuries and a 35% reduction in pedestrian injuries, but they also knew that creating a great public space is a valuable commodity. According to an old Icelandic saying that Gehl is fond of repeating “man is man’s greatest joy.” And this joy actually translates into dollars when it comes right down to it. In an interview with Sustainable Cities, an urban design blog, Sadik-Khan says that since the changes, “property values on retail rents from 47th and 42nd street went up 71% in the first six months alone.” Wow.

So. Yup. Jan Gehl basically just wants to be “sweet” to the people, and basically just wants to give them spaces to sit around and look at each other – especially if the people are young and attractive or “goodies” as he likes to call them. And apparently people appreciate that, and if more mayors, developers, architects and planners want to join in apparently not only will be livelier, happier, healthier, safer and more sustainable – maybe we will be sweet to the economy too.

You can view a similar talk given at New York’s Cooper Hewitt Museum here.

Beyond Green is pleased to work with Gehl Architects on the public realm strategy for our Broadland project.


Get ready for Monday 24th…

…’cause i’ts going to be the most miserable day of the year !

Or so the statisticians would have us believe. Christmas has been and gone and spring doesn’t seem to be getting any closer. Thank goodness, then, that the government is doing something about it!

David Cameron has asked the Office of National Statistics to find a plausible way of measuring ‘national accounts of wellbeing’.  Cynics say it’s convenient to attempt to disconnect happiness from money at a time when government finances are going into severe fasting mode, but then perhaps that can be expected.

For an alternative view, and to hear more on the above, listen again to BBC Radio 4’s discussion on last night’s, the Moral Maze with Michael Buerk chairing a panel discussion with Melanie Phillips, Matthew Taylor, Claire Fox and Clifford Longley.


Can living sustainably include eating animals?

eating animals

As the intensive farming industry, which supplies 99% of the meat that we eat today,  expands and greenhouse gases associated with agriculture begin to dominate the emissions charts, this appears to be one of the most important debates battling through the environmental movement, with the argument polarised (simplistically) between those in the Simon Fairlie camp, (‘let them eat meat but farm it right’), and many animal rights campaigners who see going vegan as the only solution.

The latter was Jonathan Safran Foer’s argument, the author of Eating Animals, who spoke to an audience this week at the RSA. In a conversation with journalist Bibi van der Zee, Foer argued eloquently that the current industrial meat industry depends entirely on our own ignorance of its impact upon animals and the environment, and that unlike so many other of the world’s worst environmental disasters, ‘we have a choice to pause and eat differently.’

Foer isn’t a normal vegetarian; it took him a long time to make the transition to a no-meat diet, and he still has strong cravings to eat it, especially fish. But cravings really are no excuse. What differentiates humans from other mammals, he argues, is our ability to say no, and saying no to meat is less challenging that ‘fighting the instinct to have sex’! Exercising reason is, for him, the key to being human.

In the future ‘we’re going to have to choose between meat and our culinary culture’, he argues, as industrialised and non-industrialised nations are adopting a way of eating that involves no silverware and can be eaten with one hand, on the move. Small farms will never feed the world, and it feels to him ‘elitist’ to eat the meat they produce.

There is hope, however, particularly as vegetarianism becomes an issue of aspirational identity. In America, where once more people claimed not to be vegetarianism than would admit to it, the situation has come full circle, with 18% of American college students claiming to eat a no-meat diet.

Vegetarianism, and eventually veganism, really is the only solution, and change happens at the next meal.


Broadland evening event “We’re all clients now: towards a new process for sustainable communities and places”

On the evening of Thursday 13th January Beyond Green Developments hosted an event at Sprowston Parish Council in North Norwich to meet parish and district councillors, community and church leaders and other stakeholders with particular interests in planning, environment, housing and economic issues. It was a well attended event and an opportunity for local community representatives to ask questions about Beyond Green’s proposals for a new sustainable community in Broadland, on the fringe of Norwich.

Beyond Green’s presentation by Jonny Anstead, Joanna Yarrow, Bruce McVean and Richard Kendall titled “We’re all clients now: towards a new process for sustainable communities and places” introduced Beyond Green, its mission, values and its local partners. It also covered findings from several months of interviews with local stakeholders and discussed ways of working with the wider community.


Are you suffering from affluenza?

Stencil - Leura, Blue Mountains, NSW

We may have won the battle against influenza, but did we miss the advent and rapid spread of Affluenza sneaking up on us?

Affluenza, according to John Elkington, is ‘a contagious, socially transmitted syndrome leading to a perceived need to stay at the cutting edge’.  Billions of us are suffering from it, he says, and whilst the stakes are high, the chances of finding a cure lie ‘at odds’ with traditional business models and ideas about the sanctity of economic growth.

The guardian are running a poll to find out what you think. Take part in it here.


Tantalising promise to move us one step closer to happiness

help

Burkeman, G2 features writer and author of ‘Help’,  has taken a deep dive into the multimillion pound industry of self help books, with their promises to make us that bit…happier, thinner, more confident. Instead of finding in them the key ingredients to mainstream happiness, he stumbles across the opposite; suggesting happiness is to be found in a rejection of these theories.

There is something fundamentally problematic with the self-helps primary focus on the self, he suggests, since ultimate happiness seems to be brought about by those very things which transcend the self e.g. families life and community interaction.  Mindfulness, having tiny goals, ‘goals so small they’re laughable’ that you can get behind them, and if you’re a perfectionist, being able to function at 60% of  your capacity, are some of his insights he offers as a solution. And interestingly, he is broadly in favour of the current movement, led by Cameron and the coalition government, towards measuring happiness.  

He ends on a quote from the Japanese psychotherapist, Shoma Morita, on how to be lead that little bit happier a life:

“give up on yourself, begin taking action now while being neurotic, or imperfect, or a procrastinator, or unhealthy or lazy or any other label by which you inaccurately describe yourself, go ahead and be the best imperfect person you can be and get started on the things you want to accomplish before you die”

You can listen to the podcast from the RSA here.


Efforts to establish ‘real’, community led small scale farming

chickens

Some of you may have followed some of the discussions that took place last week at the Oxford Farming Conference – the yearly event where agribusiness, government and retailers get together to set the agenda for the year ahead in commercial farming. It included speeches from Caroline Spellman and a debate led by Jonathan Porritt on food and population. Just a few cobbled streets away, on Tuesday and Wednesday, the Campaign for Real Farming & New Agrarian Renaissance put on a fringe event that they called the Oxford REAL Farming Conference – an alternative to the mainstream agricultural industry conference.  Day one explored the science of real farming, and was curated by Colin Tudge (Author of Trees, & Feeding people is easy amongst other titles), and Day 2 was on the health implications of real farming, edited by Graham Harvey (agric story editor of Archers, author of The Carbon Fields). Do read on if you’d like to hear some of the key points of each speaker that we have summarised below.



Day 1 Real Science for Real Farming, convened by Colin & Ruth Tudge

Tom Curtis – discussion of the benefits of non-linear, complex systems vs. the linear systems which are the basis of our existing supermarket oriented food production system. Potential for several small farms working together to share facilities / infrastructure (which is similar to a model that Growing Communities in Hackney uses and one that Church Farm – see below – hopes to build up), given that at a certain scale a farm could become too big for a non-linear, complex system to work.


Simon Fairlie is a small-scale farmer who previously worked as an editor for the Ecologist magazine and wrote the book that got Monbiot to change his mind on meat (‘Meat, a benign extravagance’). His big thing was pig swill…who knew it could provoke such enthusiasm! Following BSE/ foot & mouth, it became illegal to feed pigs on pig swill (food waste) except for personal use, thereby resulting in the loss of a significant recycling mechanism for food which is more efficient than composting and anaerobic digestion (and obviously landfill). Classical swine fever is seen as an acceptable risk for small scale pig farmers not trading on the international market; the ban in fact only supports large scale pig farmers for whom disease is a much bigger issue. Discussion of ways to get around this ban – could shared ownership schemes allow many people to benefit from the meat of a single pig?


Philip Lymbery is Chief Executive of Compassion in World Farming (CIWF), an animal welfare charity. Discussion around factory farming, showing that it feeds fewer people per acre than extensive farming given requirements for food, water, waste & disease prevention.


Dr Charlie Clutterbuck has done a lot of work on agriculture and sustainable food  with Tim Lang (City University) but now works for supermarkets helping to monitor their supply chains. He was arguing for the need for education and skills for (sustainable) agriculture in the form of both farmers and research scientists given the significant decline in both over the last 20 years. Highlighted the disconnect of people, animals and plants from the land and the need to re-establish the link through education.


Day 2 –  Real Farming – The Nations Primary Health Service, convened by Graham Harvey and chaired by Sir Crispin Tickell and looked at biological alternatives to the conventional modern farm


Sir Crispin Tickell chaired and begun the day. He is Warden of Green College Oxford and Global Environmental Advisor to the Arizona State University. Bit of a fearsome chair but very good and raised some great points,  particularly around allowing agriculture to be thrown to a free market


Iwan Jones is a dairy farmer with 100 cows in North Wales, running an organic pasture fed system and selling to a cooperative of 20 organic family farms. He talked of the national importance of grassland and compared the yield comparisons of his organic cattle and conventional cattle – his producing the same yield as conventional cows of the same breed (british fresian) but producing 1/3 less GHG and requiring less cereals and land. He also made some interesting points about the Nocton Dairies proposal, suggesting that in the planning documents it talks about each employee having a specific task e.g. cleaning the floor, cleaning the equipment, and this leads to deskilling and un-motivated staff. If we’re to get young people into farming, you need to have farmers that understand the system and are motivated by the job.


Matt Dale started North Aston Dairy in 2006, an organic micro dairy just outside Oxford that serves 250 local customers locally with milk, beef and veal and sells 75% of it milk in a 2.5 mile radius of the farm. He’s created it from scratch, and now can support 2 livelihoods from 40 acres with just 16 cows milked twice a day. The farm cuts down on costs by processing on site where possible; this means they can sell at an average price.  His model is seen as the blueprint for others going forward. The dairy is housed on land belonging to farmer with a number of other projects including a small-scale farm producing veg boxes for local people. Each enterprise is a distinct entity but linked through ownership of the land by one family.


Nick Snelgar is one of the founders of Future Farms Ltd, a community based business in Martin, Hampshire. I’ve been along and was really impressed with what they’ve set up – they have rotas for shutting up the chickens, a village shop from the produce they grow, have the demand to support around 5 full time labourers, the facilities to order online and are in the process of setting up a micro-dairy. Lots of community involvement in the form of volunteering, forum for discussion of ideas and issues in the village and interaction through the village shop. He also talked about the ‘frightening Y generation’ and how we needed to change their attitudes towards farming  we need to see the occupation once again as a meaningful and useful job, potentially by re-designing the job around humans (working hours, salary) to make it a more attractive and realistic option for youngsters. Lots of small, lively, dear little businesses running on land with farmers as self employed craftsmen…


Robert Plumb runs Soil Fertility Services in Norfolk and seemed to know all there is to know about soil auditing and “bio-logical” farming. He wouldn’t have an opinion on anything if he hadn’t tested the soil first, he said. Basically he advises farmers, including many large commercial farmers, on how to improve their soil fertility under the theory that health soil = healthy plants = healthy animals = healthy people. He began by saying America/UK is full of fat yanks that are chronically hungry i.e. highly nutritionally deficient – since we’ve now got a system where almost all processed foods are derived from a few products – corn in US and wheat and sugar beet in UK. Soils are the ‘stomach of the plant’ and soil deficiencies are destroying the nutritional content of conventionally produced foods drastically. Mineral deficiencies to look out for include Manganese and Selenium.


Dr Natasha Campbell-McBride is a neurologist and neurosurgeon and founder of the Oxford Nutritional Clinic, and completely stole the show. She was eloquent and credible, and completely dispelled the myths upon which modern nutritionalism are based – i.e. that eating fat makes you fat and in particular that high cholesterol is bad news and causes heart disease, cancers, type II diabetes etc and many of the modern western diseases now plaguing our society. Considering traditional societies survived on diets of animal fats and dairy products (as well as fresh fish, leafy veg etc)  where did the idea come from that fats are making us fat and ill? The answer is one scientist in 1953, whose theory (never proven) was seized upon by big business, pumped full of money by gov and brands for research, and has now built a huge commercial and political machine around it. Traditional food provides little opportunity to raise big bucks, but new foods promising diet benefits roll big profits. The food business is ‘not there to feed you, its there to make profit’. So, we’ve created a new science of nutritionalism (low/hydrogenated fat high sugar = good, high fat traditional food = bad), and we’ve also seen the advent of things like heart disease etc, that were not heard of before the 1920s.

Her evidence shows that:

-          a diet in low blood cholesterol is dangerous – and is associated with heart disease, cancer, violence, aggression and suicide, parkinsons disease, memory loss and early death.

-          those who eat most fat have the lowest incidence of disease,

-          those with high blood cholesterol live longest, because cholesterol is necessary to produce bile salts, vitamin D (you cannot repair anything in your body without vit D), hormones, myelin, memory, cell membranes

-          and that blood cholesterol does not come from food, it is produced by the liver, and even if you’re super skinny you may have high cholesterol


What happens with our current diet, based on processed carbs (bread, biscuits, pasta, cakes, breakfast cereals), is that we’re left with a permanent glucose overload, which leads to overproduction of insulin  and messes up our insulin mechanics long term. In the US, Children as young as 2 are being diagnosed with bi-polar syndrome because they swing from sugar highs to sugar lows. Too much glucose = too much insulin = more stores laid down as fat. Even worse, the drugs out there, and foods promising to lower blood cholesterol have not only got it all wrong, they’re also contributing to cancer, liver damage and kidney damage.


Eating fat with sugar balances blood sugar.


Other things associated with western diseases:

-          laundry powders

-          personal care products (aluminium chloride deodorants etc = breast cancer)

-          smoking

-          pharmaceuticals

-          nutritional deficiencies


The message:

-          stop eating processed foods

-          stop polluting your body

-          look after your digestive system

-          don’t be afraid of fats. Eat more fats (saturated), but make them animal fats. Pure ones. Butter, lard, goose fat. Get carried away, just steer clear of anything that has been heavily processed, and is unsaturated, like margarine, vegetable oil.


Have a look at one of her books, and some similar articles, including a Daily Telegraph article suggesting that eating sat fat ‘may not always be bad for you’. Take a look.


Charlotte Hollins (daughter of influential ecological farmer, Arthur Hollins) started Fordhall Community Farm – England’s first community owned farm – with her brother, Ben. She went straight from university onto the 140acre farm, had a battle with the landowner, and eventually decided to set up a pioneering model funded by community purchased shares in the farm – £50 each and based on foggage farming – where all animals are farmed outdoors the year round.  A farm shop sells produce from the farm but and has diversified recently to sell other items/services (including Hog Roast, local products etc.) which supplement the income of the farm without having in increase the number of animals and compromise on sustainability.


Tim Waygood is the entrepreneur that started Church Farm. Its a bit more than a farm now though. His moto is ‘you cannot live by bread alone’, so you have to have a little bit of everything: it does festivals, has a cafe and farm shop, biodiversity watching (because biodiversity has to pay for itself!), camping and log cabin hire, green gyms, catering service, box scheme, conference facility, weddings…. It also has farm pupils and interns, which together hold 32 university degrees on the farm; all they need to work effectively is proper training and passion in abundance. Having been running since April 2009 (nearly 2 years ago), it’s now just hitting the profit margins. Identified need for entrepreneurs, replicable enterprises and customers (!) for this model to work elsewhere.


Graham Harvey finished the day off by giving a history of farming, from the birth of nitrogen fertiliser and its intensive use in World War II, to the government advisory boards that championed intensive chemical farming. He paid tribute to some of the pioneering ecological farmers and farms of recent history and today, including Ben Reed, Martin Wolfe and Jodi Scheckter. And he talked about the recent IAASTD report which called for agricultural science to be more ecological in its approach, before it was hushed up by business and the government.